Foresight Gamification: Unlocking Futures Thinking through Play 

8th October 2024 by Alexandra Schlegel

In an era marked by rapid change and uncertainty, civil society organisations must proactively anticipate and prepare for diverse potential futures. Foresight practices help map these possibilities, allowing us to explore trends, opportunities, and risks. But how can we make this process not only effective but also engaging and accessible? The answer lies in gamification. 

 

What is Foresight Gamification?  

Gamification involves the integration of game elements and principles in non-game contexts. Within foresight, this means incorporating play into the typically strategic and analytical process of envisioning the future. This is achieved through structured, interactive games that encourage creativity, problem-solving, and collaboration.   

Foresight gamification transforms abstract concepts of the future into comprehensible ideas, making them easier to grasp and explore. Through game mechanics such as role-playing, storytelling, and competition, participants can immerse themselves in complex future environments, learning through play how these futures could unfold.

 

How Foresight Gamification Works in Practice 

At our recent Scanning the Horizon community session, facilitated by Shiela R Castillo, a foresight practitioner with a passion for the transformative power of cultural creatives and civil society, participants engaged with two notable foresight games:  

  • The Polak Game: This collaborative exercise invites participants to explore their beliefs about the future. Players position themselves on the game board based on whether they foresee a better or worse future than the present. They also reflect on their capacity to influence the future. This reflection prompts discussions about how personal assumptions about the future shape our current actions. 
  • The Thing from the Future: In this imaginative game, participants envision future artefacts based on specific prompts. For instance, players might describe an object from a century in the future that embodies “resentment” linked to “cloning.” This creative process encourages thinking beyond conventional boundaries, helping participants “create out-of-the-box ideas that might help them generate innovative solutions to potential future challenges.


The Benefits of Foresight Gamification
 

  1. Enhanced engagement and participation

    While some individuals may feel hesitant to participate in serious games within a professional context, gamification invites active involvement. With an open mindset, participants often find themselves “in the flow,” gaining valuable insights from the experience. The dynamic and interactive nature of these games fosters an inclusive environment where individuals are more likely to engage deeply and collaboratively.

  2. Safe space for exploration

    Gamification creates a safe, judgement-free space where participants feel comfortable sharing ideas, even if they seem absurd or laughable. This freedom encourages risk-taking and innovation, which are essential for imagining unconventional futures. In a foresight game, there are no wrong answers – just different perspectives to explore.

     

  3. Making futures thinking accessible and inclusive

    By integrating gamified approaches, foresight practices become more accessible to diverse groups. Whether conducted online or in person, games like the Polak Game and The Thing from the Future, demonstrate that complex foresight concepts can be communicated in a simple and engaging way. Playing foresight games not only makes the experience of learning about futures more enjoyable but also helps participants think strategically about long-term challenges. For example, the Polak Game helps players position themselves on different future scenarios, while The Thing from the Future allows groups to brainstorm inventive possibilities based on prompts, such as “50 years from now” or “a century into the future”. Such games stimulate creativity and forward-thinking. Additionally, foresight games can be played by whole teams, with partners and diverse communities (such as children) that civil society organisations engage with.

     

  4. Customisable and adaptable

    Foresight games are far from trivial and can yield profound insights when applied to civil society work. By linking game learnings to their day-to-day and longer-term responsibilities, players can glean valuable insights that could support their work in addressing the world’s wicked problems. Importantly, foresight games are not one-size-fits-all; they can be tailored to meet the specific needs of an organisation, or the issues being explored. As Shiela R Castillo notes, there are “no hard and fast rules” in gamification. Game elements can be adjusted or modified to align better with participants’ objectives, making these tools both versatile and impactful in addressing real-world challenges.

     

The Value of Foresight Gamification 

Foresight gamification is emerging as a valuable resource for fostering a culture of foresight, particularly within international civil society organisations where long-term, creative thinking is essential. As more organisations embrace these playful methodologies, they are likely to discover that foresight games not only enhance their capacity for future-oriented thinking but also enrich the journey, making it more engaging, participatory, and enjoyable. 

In the words of Shiela R Castillo: “We should definitely play more. If play is work for children, social development professionals can make playing serious games part of work too”. Foresight, after all, is about imagining the unimaginable, and what better way to do that than through the lens of a game? 

With this spirit, we would like to invite you to start using foresight games within your organisations and work.  

If you would like to learn more on how you can use foresight in your work, immerse yourself with the tools of foresight integrated into the Justice Based Approach in United Edge’s Strategic Foreisght Workshop for Social Justice Leaders, facilitated by Shiela R Castillo and Daniel Bevan in November. 

Alexandra Schlegel

Programme and Events Officer

International Civil Society Centre

Alexandra joined the Centre in January 2022. Her background is in Political Science and International Relations. She holds a MA in International Relations from Leiden University in the Netherlands next to her BA in Political Science and History from the University of Tübingen, Germany. In her master thesis, Alexandra wrote about the humanitarian impacts of migration agreements. During her studies, she was strongly engaged in voluntary work with different international organisations. She has lived in Germany, the UK, the Netherlands as well as Jordan and is currently living in Berlin.


The Ambivalences of Power Shift 

2nd October 2024 by Wolfgang Jamann

Power shift, localisation, locally led, and globally connected are just a few terms that try to catch the characteristics of the debate around the future of civil society organisations, particularly international ones. Sometimes dubbed as the ‘industrial aid complex that needs to be overcome’, ICSOs are increasingly looking at a transfer of decision-making power to entities or partners in the Global South, while trying to determine their own future roles. A lot of transformation is already happening in the sector, and the discussions have moved from the ‘why’ to the ‘how’ and the ‘what does it take’. 

Since 2018, the International Civil Society Centre (ICSC) accompanies power shift processes of ICSOs through so-called ‘governance labs’, where progress and challenges are addressed through mutual learning and exchange, and where best practices and failures are discussed alike. 

Each lab has a particular focus. This year we met in Thiès, Dakar, hosted by the Senegalese NGO Tostan in their Training Centre, to concentrate on the interplay of power shift with the shrinking of operating space for civil society. The underlying question was, how far can power imbalances and the desire to shift power be instrumentalised by those who want to weaken civil society, particularly in authoritarian environments. And how do we stay true to our ambitions to localise social justice work but actively address its dangers? 

A worldwide wave of nationalism is visible throughout the over 40 national elections happening in 2024. International solidarity is deprioritised in many rich societies, and liberal democracy and the role of organised civil society are actively undermined by anti-rights groups and oppressive regimes. International and local CSOs are under direct attack, the former being accused as ‘foreign agents’, the latter as Trojan horses promoting non-traditional values. In such times, the shift of decision-making powers comes with ambivalences, potentially feeding into nationalist, anti-liberal agendas. 

This year’s Power Shift Lab was the second that was held in the Global South, after the 2023 Nairobi event. It was a welcome opportunity to enrich discussions in the sector from the perspective of local communities and partner organisations of ICSOs. Reflections around the impact of shrinking space were candid and open and showed the willingness to get it right rather than moving fast. While we are looking at a new sharing of responsibilities, we need to be clear about risk sharing, new types of accountabilities, and an increased sense of solidarity between different civil society actors vis-à-vis those who try to divide and undermine us.  

Key Takeaways from the Power Shift Lab and What Leaders Are Saying:

ICSC’s Power Shift Lab in Senegal helped us as leaders within the civil society community to reflect on the intersection of governance transformation and shrinking civic space, delving into how such transformations challenge yet drive change within a complex organisation and evolving sectorMaking space to reflect on our goals and hopes for long term power shifting allowed me to think about Plan’s role as a leader in supporting girls rights and girls in crisisHow might we consider more emphasis on governance actions that we can commit to today that can build momentum from within, ensure we approach a communitydriven approach to changes in our governance, look to external partners and peers for support, and, as always, ensure our governance centres the representation and needs of young people.  I also walked away with incredible learning from peer organisations – who had boldly embraced change in terms of operating models, global pay equity, decentralised headquarters, and pursuing outside culture checks – to help ensure accountability. Thank you for the space to think about ways to move forward, to do things differently, and to leave with even better relationships with fellow colleagues and champions. 

Kathleen Sherwin, Chief Strategy & Engagement Officer (and External Representative)
Plan International 

My key insights from the Power Shift Lab were that considerable governance changes are happening across the sector, with many ICSOs not only acknowledging existing power imbalances within our organisations and with our partners and communities, but also the shared commitment to implementing and learning from new pathways to sharing agency and power, both internally and externally. While acknowledging the progress made so far, we must continue to explore new pathways towards more equitable partnerships, where local and national organisations take the lead wherever possible; meaningful involvement of diverse underserved and under-represented constituents in governance (children, people who are differently abled, youth, marginalised, etc.). We must also forward redressing institutional and financial hurdles (including donor policies and practices) by strengthening advocacy for systemic change across the humanitarian and development ecosystem. While we have focused largely on formal power in governance transformations, we hardly pay equal attention to informal sources of power and their implications for the power shift and the intersection of governance transformation and civic space. It is therefore important for us to take a critical look at our internal cultures and the external environment/cultures of the societies where we operate to determine how best to centre informal power and intentionally blend both formal and informal powers for fit-for-purpose governance frameworks and organisational strategy.  

Mohammed-Anwar Sadat Adam, Programs and Policy Influencing Lead,
Oxfam in Ghana 

I had the privilege of attending the Power Shift Lab together with eighteen dynamic representatives of civil society organisations. I was puzzled by the topic and approached the lab with an open-mind and with curiosity, ready to listen, understand, and share. During these three days, led by Wolfgang and Myriam, we asked relevant questions about the future of the sector, and we managed, as a group, to picture different roles for the future of ICSOs. It was an insightful journey, enriched by the different backgrounds and levels of responsibility of the participants. In my opinion, the key word behind the power shift is changes. Changes with big C, as these would include multiple layers, some of those needing to happen at individual level, some others at organisational-governance level, and others again at systemic level. Exploring the power dynamics, understanding the trends of the sector – and of society as a whole – and the related obstacles, allowed me to better recognise my leverages for a change. It is a process, we need to play the long game, learning how to really put the communities we work with at the centre of our actions, learning how to remain relevant while the civic space is shrinking. 

Francesco De Pasquale, Mali Country Director,
Welthungerhilfe 

Attending the ICSC Power Shift Lab was a very rewarding experience for me. It was my first time, and I found it incredibly insightful and enriching both personally and professionally. Reflecting on my own organisation’s journey and learning from others was a real eye-opener. The sessions, presentations, and discussions with a diverse group gave me solid insights into the concept of power shift and boosted my confidence to drive positive change in my organisation. One key takeaway for me is that every organisation’s path to power shift is unique, with its own milestones and success indicators. I highly recommend anyone in the development or humanitarian sector to join these labs and dive into the discussions on accelerating inclusive power shift. 

Papa Diouf, Global Practice Area Lead for Health,
VSO International 

The diversity of people, organisations, and perspectives was again the key success factor for advancing our common ambition – to become more participatory, legitimate, and locally-led, while at the same time addressing practical and political obstacles in a collaborative way. This enables collective learning and sets a sign against isolationism.  

Where do we go from here? The next step is to commit to action. Whether it’s rethinking governance models, addressing informal power structures, or actively advocating for systemic change within donor policies, ICSOs must push the envelope. As we look ahead to 2024 and beyond, let’s ensure that our efforts to shift power are not only transformative but also resilient in the face of external threats. 

Wolfgang Jamann

Executive Director

International Civil Society Centre

Dr. Wolfgang Jamann is Executive Director of the International Civil Society Centre. Until January 2018 he was Secretary General and CEO of CARE International (Geneva). Before that he led NGO Deutsche Welthungerhilfe and the Alliance 2015, a partnership of 7 European aid organisations. From 2004-2009 he was CEO & Board member of CARE Deutschland-Luxemburg and President of the CARE Foundation. Previously, he worked for World Vision International as a regional representative in East Africa (Kenya) & Head of Humanitarian Assistance at WV Germany. After his Ph.D. dissertation in 1990 he started his career in development work at the German Foundation for International Development, later for the UNDP in Zambia. As a researcher and academic, he has published books and articles on East & Southeast Asia contributing to international studies on complex humanitarian emergencies and conflict management.


Open Letter to Governments, Corporations and Philanthropies

28th August 2024 by Cyber Peace Institute and Wolfgang Jamann

We, the International Civil Society Centre, publish this Open Letter in cooperation with the CyberPeace Institute to Governments, Corporations and Philanthropies.

We represent organisations deeply committed to the public good. Whether addressing humanitarian crises, ensuring access to clean water, combating hunger, providing healthcare in remote areas, fighting violence against women, or combating child sexual abuse and human trafficking, we all face a common threat.

Today, we unite in a collective call to action, urging governments, corporations, philanthropies, and other benefactors to take decisive steps in safeguarding the cybersecurity of the valiant organisations that tirelessly combat the societal challenges we face.

In recent years, the digitisation of our activities has accelerated exponentially. Our organisations, employees, and volunteers are now part of an increasingly complex digital landscape. While this digitisation has significantly enhanced our ability to scale and deploy our missions rapidly, it has also exposed us to a myriad of cyber threats.

The digital domain now also serves as a battleground where our organisations, staff, and those we serve are targeted relentlessly. Whether it is data theft, reputational and credibility damage through disinformation, brutal ransomware attacks on our systems, or attempts to deploy spyware in our infrastructures, we face the most serious threats.

In an environment where resources are stretched and where we want those resources to be focused on the missions we are delivering, it is extremely challenging to keep pace with the evolving cybersecurity landscape. We lack the resources and expertise to undertake the state-of- the-art cybersecurity measures that our mission requires, and even completing basic steps can be challenging in many organisations.

This situation must change. Non-profit organisations stand on the frontlines, offering aid and support to the most vulnerable, yet they face an ever-growing barrage of cyber threats that could undermine their noble missions.

We call for the following measures to bolster the cybersecurity posture of civil society organisations:

  • Access to sustainable funding, through the establishment of a specialised fund, designed to improve the accessibility of cybersecurity tools, services, and platforms that meet our needs, without compromising our operational capacity or our ability to finance our missions.
  • An unwavering commitment from states, coupled with the expertise of cybersecurity experts, to identify and relentlessly pursue malicious actors that target our operations.
  • A public commitment from nation-states to not attack our organisations, including but not limited to, disseminating disinformation about and leveraging spyware against them.
  • Comprehensive public documentation on the human, societal, and environmental impacts of cyberattacks and disinformation campaigns against our organisations fostering a culture of transparency and accountability in cyberspace.
  • Formal recognition of the civil society sector as a global critical infrastructure providing essential support worldwide.

Together, we can create a safer digital environment for those who strive to make our world a better place.

SIGNATORIES

Alistair Davison, Executive Director, Cordoba Peace Institute

Alix Vuillemin, Executive Director, Women’s Initiatives for Gender Justice

Andrew McCracken, Global Director, WaterAid International

Ángela María Rosales Rodríguez, Interim CEO, SOS Children’s Villages International

Avril Benoit, CEO, Doctors Without Borders USA

Bogdan Ivanel, Founder & CEO, Commit Global

Carlos Sanvee, Secretary General, YMCA

Caroline Harper, Chief Executive, Sightsavers

Casey Harden, CEO, World Young Women’s Christian Association

Cherian Mathews, CEO, HelpAge International

Ciprian Stănescu, President, Social Innovation Solutions

Daniel Eriksson, CEO, Transparency International

Denton Howard, Executive Director, INHOPE – The International Association of Internet Hotlines

Franziska Heine, Executive Director, Wikimedia Deutschland

Hervé Pichelin, Director, Maison Internationale des Associations (MIA)

James Cowan, CEO, The HALO Trust

Joeri Buhrer Tavanier, Acting Executive Director, Netherlands Helsinki Committee

Julian Newman, Campaigns Director, Environmental Investigation Agency

Julie Jacobson, Managing Partner & Co-Founder, Bridges to Development

Justin Vaïsse, Founder & Director General, Paris Peace Forum

Karin Maasel,  CEO, Data Friendly Space (DFS)

Karin van Boxtel, Director, Both ENDS

Kathleen A. Sherwin, Chief Strategy and Engagement Officer, Plan International

Kiran Nazish, Founding Director, The Coalition For Women In Journalism 

Kirsten Burkhart, Executive Director, AIDS Resource Alliance, Inc.

Liz Hume, Executive Director, Alliance for Peacebuilding

Lydia Foeken, CEO, World Marrow Donor Association

Lysa John Berna, Secretary General, CIVICUS World Alliance for Citizen Participation

Maaike van Doorsen, Managing Director, The London Story

Mahdi Yahya, Chairman, Peace of Art International

Mark Jacobs, Managing Director, SEED Madagascar

Marta L. Tellado,  CEO, Consumer Reports 

Melanio Escobar, Executive Director, RedesAyuda

Melchior Lengsfeld, Executive Director Helvetas

Omri Preiss, Managing Director, Alliance4Europe

Paul Ash, Chief Executive, Christchurch Call Foundation

Philip Grant, Executive Director, TRIAL International

Philip Reitinger, President & CEO, Global Cyber Alliance

Pim Kraan, CEO, Save the Children Netherlands

Simon O’Connell, CEO, SNV

Stéphane Duguin, CEO, CyberPeace Institute

Thibaut Bruttin, Director General, Reporters Without Borders

Wolfgang Jamann, Executive Director, International Civil Society Centre

For more information about the initiative, please contact the CyberPeace Institute at media@cyberpeaceinstitute.org.

Cyber Peace Institute

Cyber Peace Institute

Cyber Peace Institute is an NGO, supporting NGOs and other critical sectors, offering free cybersecurity assistance, threat detection and analysis whilst advocating for safety and security in cyberspace.

Wolfgang Jamann

Executive Director

International Civil Society Centre

Dr. Wolfgang Jamann is Executive Director of the International Civil Society Centre. Until January 2018 he was Secretary General and CEO of CARE International (Geneva). Before that he led NGO Deutsche Welthungerhilfe and the Alliance 2015, a partnership of 7 European aid organisations. From 2004-2009 he was CEO & Board member of CARE Deutschland-Luxemburg and President of the CARE Foundation. Previously, he worked for World Vision International as a regional representative in East Africa (Kenya) & Head of Humanitarian Assistance at WV Germany. After his Ph.D. dissertation in 1990 he started his career in development work at the German Foundation for International Development, later for the UNDP in Zambia. As a researcher and academic, he has published books and articles on East & Southeast Asia contributing to international studies on complex humanitarian emergencies and conflict management.


Digital Dialogue: Exploring Digital Technology and Social Justice

21st August 2024 by Rachel Wilkinson

The Digital Dialogue series has become a key platform for civil society organisations (CSOs) worldwide to discuss topics related to digital technology and its impact on civil society. The panel series promotes understanding and awareness of the complex intersections between digital technology and the work of CSOs, while exploring the specific challenges and solutions for civil society organisations. “Through a variety of discussions, this series offers a space to address some of the biggest challenges CSOs face today, promoting a more inclusive, ethical, and collaborative approach to civic technology,” says Wolfgang Jamann, Executive Director of the Centre.

Now in its fourth year, the Digital Dialogue audience is spread across the globe. In our last dialogue, our audience represented every continent except Antarctica. So far this year, we have seen over 1,300 registrations from a wide variety of international CSOs, local CSOs, academics, and other civil society actors regularly joining our monthly sessions.

Map of where people are joining the session.

As diverse as the topics and audience are the panellists, most of whom work in CSOs and academia. “We look for practical people who are at the same time firmly grounded in principles and values,” says Ryan Stanton, the Event Manager of the Centre. He is proud that every single panel is balanced in terms of gender and geographic origin.

The International Civil Society Centre partners with CTIN (Civic Tech Innovation Network), and Digital Dialogue is a collaboration between both organisations. The panels are held (almost) monthly, except for breaks in August and January, on the first Thursday of the month. Geci Karuri-Sebina of CTIN says, “Our objective is to offer inclusive and, at the same time, diverse perspectives from expert speakers from both the Global North and South to enrich the dialogue and give a complete view of global challenges and innovative solutions in civic tech.” This year, the theme for our panels has been social justice, and we are debating how digital technology advancements should serve the public good and not increase inequalities.

In February, the series started with a session on e-waste management, highlighting the urgent need for responsible consumption, recycling, and supporting the right to repair movement. This discussion stressed the importance of regulating production and adopting circular economy practices to address the growing problem of electronic waste.

March and April’s sessions focused on elections, democratic participation, and digital technology, with an emphasis on Africa. March’s session examined digital technology’s influence on participation and transparency, while April’s session discussed youth participation, tech platforms, and advocacy campaigns. These discussions showcased various tactics employed to influence elections, as well as advocacy campaigns and technological solutions aimed at encouraging people to actively participate in elections, thereby increasing their involvement in democracy.

In May, the focus was on protecting minority groups from digital targeting, particularly LGBTQ+ groups and individuals. This important session explored strategies to shield vulnerable communities from online threats and advocated for creating safe and inclusive digital environments.

June’s dialogue tackled the complex role of artificial intelligence in conflict situations. The discussion considered the ethical issues of using AI in conflict zones, such as the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, particularly Gaza. The panellists weighed the potential benefits against the risks posed by these technologies.

July’s session focused on the ethics and accountability of civic tech development. This panel highlighted the responsibilities of developers and organisations to maintain ethical standards and stressed the need for accountability and protecting users from unethical tech practices.

In every Digital Dialogue session, we are committed to inclusivity and accessibility for all participants. Thanks to the support of Sightsavers and CBM Christian Blind Mission, we provide sign language interpretation and live captioning to ensure that the discussions are accessible to the deaf and hard of hearing community. At each session, there is one deaf and one hearing sign interpreter, working together to bridge communication and promote an inclusive dialogue. This initiative reflects our belief in creating a space where everyone can engage meaningfully, regardless of their hearing ability.

“The 2024 Digital Dialogue series by the International Civil Society Centre and Civic Tech Innovation Network continues to inspire CSOs through the complex relationship between technology and social justice,” says Nkosinathi Mcetywa of CTIN. The series offers valuable insights into the complex issues affecting CSOs. These discussions not only highlight the challenges but also point the way towards a more equitable and just technological future. The series also emphasises the importance of working together, showing how multi-stakeholder approaches can have a greater impact.

Join us in September for our next panel in the 2024 series, on 5 September 2024, at 4 pm CEST: Can technology help address global food security challenges?

You can find information on past sessions and catch up on previous panels here.  Are there any topics you would like to see covered in a future Digital Dialogue, let us know!

 

Rachel Wilkinson

Programme Manager – Futures and Innovation

International Civil Society Centre

Rachel leads the Futures and Innovation programme at the Centre. She is responsible for managing the portfolio of projects and events as well as leading and developing the Scanning the Horizon strategic peer learning platform. Rachel has more than 15 years of experience working in the third sector, on a national and international level, working for various ICSOs in international development and human rights in both London and Berlin.


Navigating the Digital Frontier: Karl Steinacker’s Insights on the Digitalisation

19th June 2024 by Karl Steinacker

Within the sector, the International Civil Society Centre (the Centre) is neither vanguard nor laggard when it comes to digitalisation. The Centre acknowledges there is room for improvement in its digital performance. However, from a modest and realistic perspective, its achievements are remarkable and offer valuable insights for others in the sector. 

Practical Steps Towards Digital Transformation

When the French rock band Feu! Chatterton sings about the new world (Nouveau Monde), it concludes that despite the fact that while we all want it, achievements are, as they put it, zero, and continues: ‘catch the Bluetooth’. Feu’s view that we are driven by, rather than drivers of, digital transformation should not be taken as a factual statement but as an incentive to do better. 

Over the years, the Centre has introduced remote work, moved its IT to the cloud, and set up a media studio to support live streams and many online events. This followed an inductive approach and came about without grand design. Questions about off-the-shelf products vs. open-source and non-proprietary software were handled practically (often in favour of the former) and not ideologically. Cybersecurity, an often-overlooked risk in civil society organisations, was outsourced to cloud-based business partners. When running an organisation committed to social justice on small budgets, pragmatic decisions and cost-efficient software are often utilized. 

Reinventing Convening in the Digital Age

In the first quarter of the 21st century, CSOs must navigate the digital sphere. For a long time, convening was no longer meant to reserve conference facilities or arrange for cookies during coffee breaks. Be it the Centre’s annual Global Perspectives, open to everybody, or the Vision Works and Leading Together events for CEOs and senior CSO staff to discuss key strategic issues, best practices, and opportunities for joint action online as well as offline.  

And when the Solidarity Action Network is addressing civic space restrictions, it looks as much at cyberspace as any other operating condition CSOs may face. Likewise, the Leave No One Behind Partnership, hosted by the Centre delivers practical solutions so that marginalised communities no longer remain invisible to official statistics. Here again, the relevance of the project is linked to its successful delivery of digital solutions. The Accelerating Inclusive Power Shift project would be futile if it did not address access to technology as a determining power factor. 

Collaborations and Global Engagement

For three years, the Centre, jointly with CivicTech Africa, has been organising a monthly online panel discussion known as Digital Dialogues to bring relevant issues on digital technology to the civil society sector. On each occasion, eminent speakers, both from the Global North and the Global South, are invited to discuss the ongoing digital transformation from a civil society perspective. The variety of topics covered in more than 30 panels is incredibly varied, encompassing cyber mediation, digital colonialism, hacking for good, and others. The Digital Dialogues panel discussion on diversity led the Centre to upgrade its websites and introduce international sign language and captions to be as inclusive as possible for audiences. 

While the Centre is seen as a major convener, bringing together traditional social justice actors and with a newly set-up digital focus, it also contributes to the wider efforts within the civil society sector. In 2023, the NetHope Global Summit provided an opportunity for an in-person experience in Munich (Germany) and virtual gatherings, which the Centre was happy to contribute to. We led sessions across time zones, fostering ideas to link social justice, collaboration, and technological innovation. We also provided an Executive Leaders’ forum, co-hosted by the ICSC and NetHope, on how artificial intelligence is affecting the work of civil society. 

The Intersection of Technology and Human Behaviour

Members of CSOs and the non-profit sector met representatives of tech companies in order to exchange ideas and reflect on innovative ways forward for the benefit of the humanitarian, conservation, and development sectors. While there is no doubt that technology matters, the workshop What Next for Mis-, Dis-, and Malinformation in a “Post Truth” World? looked in particular at the interplay of technology and human behaviour. The virtual workshop Supporting and Surveilling the Deserving Poor not only provided a historic tour d’horizon of social welfare programmes but also reviewed the ongoing digital transformation of welfare in places as different as India and Denmark. It also explored the potential of unconditional basic income in Finland. 

Sustainability and Digital Development

In an era defined by rapid technological advancement and growing environmental concerns, the need for a more sustainable approach to digital development has never been greater. Hence, there is a need to explore important theories such as the Digital Doughnut. However, only time and further consideration will tell if they provide the answers we are looking for. 

The Need for Continuous Digital Integration

So, our digital journey goes on. As long as CSOs continue to work on relevant issues of social justice, addressing the effects of the ongoing digital transformation will remain inevitable, and many CSOs have integrated digital issues into their overall strategies and programmes and with current advancements in digital technology, this is now more important than ever.  

Artists inspire us. That is why we love them. The Austrian pop band Yukno offers their outlook on the Digital Playground and sings: I will reinvent myself; I will never be alone again! It’s on this positive note that we wish to end this tour d’horizon with the renewed understanding that civil society needs ‘The Digital’ to make our world a better place! 

Karl Steinacker

Digital Advisor

International Civil Society Centre

Karl Steinacker is currently the Digital Advisor of the International Civil Society Centre. He studied political science at the Free University of Berlin and international law at Cambridge University. He then spent three decades working for the United Nations (UNDP, UNRWA, DPKO, UNHCR) in the fields of development, peacekeeping and refugee protection. At the UN Refugee Agency, he held positions in Africa and at its Headquarters and was responsible for Registration, Statistics, and Data and Identity Management as well as for Camp Coordination/Camp Management.


Decolonising mindsets and language: Reflections from the #ShiftthePower Summit

19th March 2024 by Myriam Ciza Gambini

At the end of last year, I had the chance to participate in the #Shift the Power Summit in Bogotá, organised by the Global Fund for Community Foundations and TerritoriA, which gave me, and the International Civil Society Centre further resolve in supporting ICSOs in their power shift journey. The Summit gathered over 700 participants from over 70 countries to discuss how to work together to truly shift power and overcome the blockages that prevent a truly systemic change of the system, moving away from top-heavy and top-down systems of international development and philanthropy. 

While in recent years the debates around shifting power, localisation and decolonisation within the civil society sector have gained prominence, resulting in an increasing number of actors seeking to foster a paradigm shift, the challenges to dismantle and readdress power, roles and responsibilities remain significant. 

The Summit was a pivotal event that saw activists, national and international organisations and funders, convene in agreement that the current development and philanthropy systems are not fit for purpose but require a radical restructuring of their architecture. 

Shift the Power Stage in Bogotá, Columbia 2023
Shift the Power Stage in Bogotá, Columbia 2023

As Marie-Rose Romain Murphy of the Haiti Community Foundation, poignantly said in her address:

Communities have been historically marginalised in the development process by governments and NGOs. Shifting power means recognising that local communities hold the solutions.” 

During the conference, communities and practitioners who have been historically disenfranchised were front and centre. Throughout the discussions and sessions, we reflected on how as actors we can foster an enabling environment for change, avoiding window dressing and empty commitments. 

In order for significant shifts to happen it is pivotal for organisations to re-examine their assumptions regarding where they stand in the sector. Developing self-awareness and defusing power dynamics within an organisation is helpful in ensuring that partnerships are genuine, built on trust, and free from exploitative practices. For international civil society organisations (ICSOs) changing the system entails not giving away power entirely, but rather engaging with it to progressively shift it to communities we aim to serve.  

A key question that was discussed during the Summit was: Beside shifting power as a moral imperative, what does it mean for development and philanthropy actors to address the problem of power inequities? 

Since 2018, the International Civil Society Centre’s Power Shift Labs have addressed the problem of power imbalances between Northern and Southern, but also between large and small, rich and resource-scarce entities of ICSOs. During the Labs, ICSO leaders explored the questions of how to overcome barriers and lead the necessary transformational power shifts in governance. Our goal is to prioritise the perspectives of the communities we serve by facilitating the exchange of lessons learned while supporting organisations in re-evaluating how they add value to a system that is infused with a colonial mindset.

Graphic Recording at Shift the Power Summit 2023

The Summit highlighted that the challenging and dismantling structures that perpetuate power imbalances is paramount to define the legitimacy of ICSOs in the civil society ecosystem. 

Here are some of the reflections from the Summit on how organisations can start addressing power imbalances: 

Power Shift cannot happen without mindset change 

At the Summit, there were several discussions around the idea that before shifting power we need to shift culture and mindsets, and that requires individual reflections. Most dimensions that contribute to unequal decision making can be interpreted through an intersectional lens. To fight such inequalities, organisations should commit to identifying and eradicating the negative power dimensions that allowed such decision-making structures to develop and foster. Power imbalances are recognised as being not only an issue between Global North and South, but also across Southern, patriarchal power dimensions. All individuals working in the sector ought to ask themselves; how do you use power responsibly once you have it? How can we use our positionality and power to influence the sector to do better? 

Concrete change requires strong sponsorship 

In many organisations, there is a public commitment to being less colonial at internal and structural level and more conscious of power imbalances. While at macro-level, there is widespread agreement on the need to change and on such intent, there is a lack of vision of how to achieve change in the short-term, resulting in lack of consistent progress. In fact, while at a personal level, decision-makers might want to be de-colonial, they often struggle to transfer such commitment to the policy and strategy level. Finding sponsors for change within the organisation is crucial to implement such theoretical commitments and move from policy to concrete action. 

There is a wealth of power in language and communication 

The use of empowering language is a key tool to establish genuine and more equitable partnerships with communities, moving away from bureaucracy and flawed impact measurement to shared values and empathy for each other’s needs. Reflecting and being intentional about language also requires avoiding the co-option of the language of liberation, that radical groups have used to address the need to overhaul the system. Furthermore, while most organisations agree that decision-making should be moved to the closest point of impact, efforts to prioritise such commitments should be communicated better, creating safe spaces for critical and thought-provoking discussions.  

We look forward to exchanging with organisations that endeavour to embrace this transformative mission despite the challenges. One of our key avenues to build momentum is the Power Shift Lab, which serves as a dedicated platform for a comprehensive review and assessment of the intricate interplay between power dynamics, organisational intent, and governance reform. This year’s Power Shift Lab, taking place on 10-12 June 2024 in Senegal in collaboration with Tostan, will focus on the intersection of governance transformations and shrinking civic space, delving into how such transformations affect local civil society. Connecting with local initiatives, we will further assess how to develop governance frameworks that facilitate the empowerment of local decision-makers in strategy, with the aim to dismantle the top-down decision-making structures that still pervade the sector.  

If you are interested in participating in the event, want to find out more or keep up to date with our Accelerating Inclusive Power Shift initiative, sign up for our newsletter or reach out to Myriam Ciza Gambini, directly at mcgambini@icscentre.org

 

Myriam Ciza Gambini

Project Manager

International Civil Society Centre

Myriam coordinates the “Accelerating Inclusive Power Shift” project, which aims to foster equitable partnerships and more inclusive governance models in the development and humanitarian sectors. Prior to joining the Centre, she worked on EU development policy in Brussels for CONCORD and Humanity & Inclusion and with CBM in Italy.


Scanning the Horizon: Digital Doughnut

11th March 2024 by Rachel Wilkinson

Every year, institutions release their trend reports. Recently, the World Economic Forum identified four different environmental issues as the most significant risks facing the world in the next 10 years. The UNDP Trends Report cites four climate-related trends in its top 13 themes. However, we know climate change is not merely a future trend, we are already feeling the damaging effects of climate change. February 2024 was globally the warmest on record. 

The Scanning the Horizon Community, hosted by the International Civil Society Centre, investigates trends and signals affecting civil society and looks to apply this learning and approach to Civil Society Organisations. At the start of the year, the Scanning Community met to examine and explore those areas where digital technology and the environment converge. 

We delved into a thought-provoking workshop to understand the intricate relationship between digital technologies and sustainability. Taking the Doughnut Economic Modela framework, developed by Kate Raworth, that challenges traditional notions of economic success and sustainability, –  we were able to use the ‘Digital Doughnut’, a visual tool that helped us explore the nuances of our digital footprint.  

The Doughnut Economic Model offers a holistic approach to sustainable development. It visualises a “safe and just space for humanity,” represented by the area between the inner and outer rings of the doughnut. The inner ring denotes the minimum standards of well-being that every person should have access to, as outlined by the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Meanwhile, the outer ring represents the planetary boundaries we must not exceed to safeguard the health of our planet. 

Doughnut Economics
Doughnut Economics

This model prompts us to consider not only the immediate impacts of our actions but also their long-term consequences on both people and the planet. By framing sustainability within this broader context, we are compelled to think beyond mere environmental conservation and examine the systemic issues at play. 

The intersection of technology and sustainability is a pressing issue in today’s world. While technological advancements offer huge benefits, they also pose significant challenges to our environment and society. From the proliferation of electronic waste to the energy-intensive nature of digital infrastructure, the digital sector has a substantial ecological footprint. We do not always think about the physical and environmental infrastructure of digital technology. Cloud technology, for example, requires a significant amount of energy and waste. A Google data centre uses 450,000 litres of water per day.  Training a single AI model can emit as much carbon as five cars in their lifetimes. There is often a hidden environmental cost to all this new technology. 

The ‘Digital Doughnut’ takes the doughnut economy and uses the model to assess digital technologies. During our workshop, led by Alistair Alexander, participants examined the global impact of digital technologies and their implications for planetary health. We explored pressing topics like disinformation, e-waste, and energy consumption, shedding light on the multifaceted challenges we face. 

In an era defined by rapid technological advancement and growing environmental concerns, the need for a more sustainable approach to digital development has never been greater. When we talk about sustainability in the tech realm, it is easy to focus solely on surface-level solutions like renewable energy and recycling. While these are crucial steps, we must not lose sight of the deeper questions. What are the underlying paradigms and systems driving climate change? How is digital technology contributing to this crisis and what fundamental changes are needed? 

You can find out more about the Digital Doughnut here: https://doughnuteconomics.org/ and here: https://reclaimed.systems/The-Digital-Doughnut or contact Alistair directly. 

At the heart of our efforts with Scanning the Horizon is collaboration with our members and partners to bolster future literacy within the sector. We are actively engaged in charting and anticipating emerging trends.

Our Scanning the Horizon Community unites professionals from diverse sectors to share knowledge, and expertise, and test novel methodologies. Please email us if your organisation is interested in gaining more insight into our community as part of its foresight work. We look forward to hearing from you. 

Rachel Wilkinson

Programme Manager – Futures and Innovation

International Civil Society Centre

Rachel leads the Futures and Innovation programme at the Centre. She is responsible for managing the portfolio of projects and events as well as leading and developing the Scanning the Horizon strategic peer learning platform. Rachel has more than 15 years of experience working in the third sector, on a national and international level, working for various ICSOs in international development and human rights in both London and Berlin.


Anticipate, Adapt, Act: Shaping a resilient future for civil society

13th February 2024 by Mareyah Bhatti, Eva Gondor, Patricia Mugenzi

It is widely understood that the civil society sector faces undue restrictions and threats to its operating space globally. To help strengthen the capacity of civil society actors, we need to develop the ability to anticipate the future and act in a proactive manner to shape the future. The International Civil Society Centre and Forum for the Future recently collaborated on this issue at the International Civic Forum (ICF) 2023, a two-day workshop in Brussels joined by 40 actors from across the civil society sector. 

 

 

How do civil society organisations (CSOs) accustomed to fire-fighting crises imagine more adaptative and agile ways of preparedness and planning?

In mid-2023, we joined efforts to design a replicable methodology that offered a creative and engaging way to use future stories and scenarios leading to 2034. The purpose of this was to help CSOs design current and future strategic plans and inform their practices. The objectives offered participants a way to explore a range of possible futures and identify potential action areas to navigate those varied futures on three distinct levels: as individuals, organisations, and as a sector. We hoped to use the ICF 2023 to test the methodology and receive feedback on how it can be developed to support future planning for CSOs. 

The sessions took the attendees on a journey… first immersing them in the present and exploring current trends, then travelling to alternative possible futures based on the set of trends, and finally bridging the gap between possible futures and their actions, resources and mindsets. While the workshop surfaced several sectoral actions, the sessions were designed to ensure a focus on the attendees present and their specific agency and role in driving the change needed.

How could they as individuals in their respective roles contribute to their organisation’s resilience? And how could their organisation work with others to reduce sector-wide vulnerability? 

We designed the sessions to be generative spaces that led the group to bring their experience and expertise while stretching beyond what exists in the present and imagining more ambitious (yet tangible) actions for possible futures. 

“As CSOs, we need to get used to ‘futurisingas this informs current actions and helps us to avoid ‘routinising’.ICF participant

 

The participants produced a range of ideas at the sectoral, organisational, and individual levels that we summarised below:

Sector-wide actions

  1. We need to empower and involve local communities

Anticipation is about participation and if we want to build a better future, we need to listen to local communities, invest in community relations, and change approaches to collaboration. Local partners need to be involved from the beginning of processes; communities need to be turned into co-investors and co-designers rather than receivers. 

  1. The language we use needs to shift to remove barriers to involvement

As raised by a participant and echoed by many around the room, the language around development is “colonial-centric”. It is often in English, French, or Spanish and filled with jargon that can be difficult to interact with. How can we expect to involve people in decision-making and hear their voices, if the language or medium of conduct is inherently exclusionary? For communities – and the youth in particular – to be deeply involved, we need to think about access to such spaces and especially the language we use.

  1. We need to apply a more holistic approach and deepen collaboration on intersectional problems

The challenges we face in the civil society sector are complex and interconnected, and therefore require intersectional approaches. Rather than approaching challenges in isolation, we can use a similar concept to the “whole child approach” or “one health approach” to recognise intersectional identities, needs, and experience.

  1. We need to craft futures across the civil society sector and together with other sectors

Foresight needs to be ‘humanised’ and made approachable. It was viewed by many as a key skill to prepare for the future, and therefore needs to be done by a wider range of stakeholders. Thinking about the future is inherently a human act. Instead of approaching uncertainty with the usual sense of fear, foresight allows us to plan and stress test approaches against potential futures in a more informed manner. 

The process led to some aha’ moments for me which will have a significant impact on my planning.” ICF participant

Organisational actions

The participants worked in pairs or peer groups to draft tangible organisational plans they can contribute to. The ideas revolved around two aspects:

  • Strengthening participation and inclusiveness in decision-making processes International and local CSOs need to invest more into co-creation, reflection, and exploration of alternatives with partners and communities.
  • Building foresight capacities and applying foresight within organisational activities
    The participants left motivated to involve their colleagues, partners, and allies in further collaborative foresight processes and exercises.

Individual actions

Building foresight capacities and their application were further underlined in concrete individual actions that the participants expressed their interest in developing such as:

  • Promoting and prioritizing knowledge sharing about foresight to broaden perspectives
  • Planning a foresight exercise for colleagues to strengthen organisational capacities 
  • Integrating futures thinking into existing processes and upcoming strategies

The individual actions identified during the ICF 2023 underscore the importance of fostering foresight at multiple levels — empowering local communities, shifting organisational language, and humanizing foresight for broader stakeholder engagement to ensure plans, projects, and strategies reflect our hopes for the future.

“Futures thinking is a systemic process and should be given due attention.

 

So, what does this mean? 

Being a systemic process, futures thinking should be approached comprehensively, considering all interconnected aspects. In essence, it means recognising the need for a thorough strategy when addressing global challenges in the civil society sector. By practicing futures thinking, we take a proactive stance in tackling the complex issues faced by the sector, while fostering resilience, collaboration, and inclusivity. It is about developing the capacity to not only monitor trends but also to envision, through a participatory approach, how they might unfold providing us with a powerful tool to break away from conventional crisis management practices. Futures thinking urges us to be strategic, forward-looking, and adaptable in our approach, ensuring a more effective response to the evolving landscape of the civil society sector. 

 

Find out more 

The ICF 2023 was part of a wider three-year initiative “Anticipating futures for civil society operating space (2022 – 2025) led by the International Civil Society Centre. The initiative aims to strengthen anticipatory capacities and future readiness of civil society professionals who are working to defend and expand civic and civil society operating space. Check out this website to find further information and resources from this initiative and possibilities of involvement. 

 

Mareyah Bhatti

Change Designer

Forum for the Future

Mareyah is a Change Designer at Forum for the Future, with an academic background in medical geography and personal passion for food systems and their cultural significance. She works closely in the Food and Futures teams at Forum, managing and delivering their programmes. She was recently seconded to Singapore for the 'Protein Challenge Southeast Asia,' a runner-up for the esteemed Food Planet Prize. Beyond this, Mareyah contributes to Forum’s Future Centre platform as an editor, identifying emerging signals and authoring blogs on topics from the future of protein to human rights in the fashion supply chain.

Eva Gondor

Senior Project Manager

International Civil Society Centre

Eva leads on the Centre's civic space work - the Solidarity Action Network (SANE) aimed at strengthening resilience of and solidarity among civil society actors, and the International Civic Forum (ICF), our annual civic space platform to network and identify opportunities for collaboration. Prior to joining the Centre she worked at the Robert Bosch Stiftung (Foundation) in Stuttgart where she managed the foundation’s projects focusing on civil society and governance in Turkey, the Western Balkans, and North Africa.

Patricia Mugenzi

Strategic Foresight

International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (IFRC)

Patricia is the coordinator for Strategic foresight (Africa Region) at the International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (IFRC). She helps IFRC’s National societies explore possible futures to address upcoming challenges. Before joining the IFRC, Patricia served in various positions in both international and governmental organisations, including the Government of Quebec. In this role, she provided invaluable insights and guidance on geopolitical matters, playing a pivotal role in shaping government policies and strategies.


Envisioning Tomorrow: Reflections from the International Civic Forum 2023 

23rd January 2024 by Elizabeth Parsons

The stage was set for the International Civic Forum (ICF) before the end of 2023 in the vibrant and creative innovation space of Transforma Lab, Brussels. For two days, a workshop with forty participants from around the globe was held with the aim of preparing them, their civil society organisations, and the civil society sector at large for anticipating futures. This is by no means an easy feat, but we were fortunate to hear how it played out for three participants: Patrick Allam, the Legal Officer from Spaces for Change, Melissa Juisi Simo, the West Africa Civil Society Institute’s (WACSI) Programmes Assistant, and Răzvan-Victor Sassu, the Head of Strategy and Policy for the World YMCA. In the interviews, they shared with us their thoughts about foresight and futures crafting and their takeaways from the experience.  

Regarding “futures” work, what has been your connection? 

Before attending the ICF 2023, all three interviewees had varied connections to futures work. As Melissa noted, most civil society organisations are essentially in “reaction mode.” Although her organisation has begun pursuing futures work, it is still a new area for her personally to explore. Prior to taking part in the ParEvo foresight exercise run by the ICSCentre in the first half of 2023, Patrick hadn’t work with it before. ParEvo is a participatory and evolutionary approach to creating stories about possible futures. In the exercise, 15 participants developed stories about possible civic space futures through eight iterations of storytelling. Patrick began the exercise with a great deal of scepticism and uncertainty about the future. But later on:

“I now recognize the role that we can play in ensuring that the future is one that we can actively govern and possibly shape its outcomes.” Patrick

Patrick Allam, the Legal Officer from Spaces for Change
Patrick Allam, the Legal Officer from Spaces for Change

Through this work, he started to see potential for a more positive future. On the other hand, for Răzvan, it is a daily reality to acknowledge the importance of foresight in the development of global strategy and policy. Futures thinking had already been incorporated into Răzvan’s strategic processes, but he pointed out that:

“We also want to try to expand the network of people who actually think futures thinking is important. We don’t want it to remain limited to a bubble in Geneva who finds it significant.”  Răzvan

Răzvan-Victor Sassu, the Head of Strategy and Policy for the World YMCA
Răzvan-Victor Sassu, the Head of Strategy and Policy for the World YMCA

The three participants all agree on the importance of futures thinking, despite having varying degrees of experience with it.

“We need futures if we want to lead the future that we are going into, if we want to see innovation, and if we want to see participation.” Melissa

How can we go about futures thinking? 

Melissa compares futures thinking to a daily task, something one will do daily to ensure longevity, efficiency and optimal productivity. She thinks that this strategy will promote creativity and teamwork – all of which are crucial for imagining the future. When talking about the strategy of his organisation, Răzvan brings up the creation of a think tank to facilitate strategic foresight, especially with regard to the needs of young people. He highlights the challenges of prioritising future thinking amidst ongoing crises and funding constraints, suggesting the integration of bite-sized future thinking activities into existing processes. Patrick emphasises the value of systematic future planning, not only within his organisation but also extending to their networks, having been influenced by his ICF experience. In his view, this is a means of being proactive as opposed to reactive, working towards a situation in which upcoming events won’t come as a surprise. 

Did you have any “aha” moments at the ICF? 

“Where can we make a difference now that will make a difference in the future?” is a quote that motivated Melissa.

How am I making a difference now for the future and not just making a difference now to correct the past? Because that has been the pattern.” Melissa

Melissa Juisi Simo, the West Africa Civil Society Institute's (WACSI) Programmes Assistant
Melissa Juisi Simo, the West Africa Civil Society Institute’s (WACSI) Programmes Assistant

Melissa further underlined: “It was so beautiful for me to see that although we’re different groups from different parts of the world, we’re able to see similar risks and opportunities available for civil society.” But at the same time, she reflected that if there is too much alignment in thinking and we only stay within civil society, this might lead to the omission of some crucial perspectives. There is a need for increased cooperation between civil society and other sectors, including the government and business when it comes to shaping the future. Răzvan’s eureka moment centred on the notion that the workshop simplified the idea of “futures literacy” for those who are unfamiliar with it. He can imagine that creating a simple “package” for organisations would be helpful. Patrick’s realisation was that:

“Instead of finding ourselves in the future, where we are in the vicious circle of always reacting to issues as they come up, the goal is that everyone of us will move to the mode where we are actively shaping our future.” Patrick

He adds that this approach shouldn’t be only applied when it comes to organisational strategy but also for funding and community involvement.  

International Civic Forum 2023 Group Photo
International Civic Forum 2023 Group Photo

What will you do with the insights from the ICF? 

Melissa, Patrick, and Răzvan talked about how they wanted to incorporate futures thinking into their work going forward. Melissa intends to absorb the information and share it with others through an article that can be used as a reference. Her second ambition is to develop a curriculum or a learning material to share with other civil society organisations to strengthen their capacities. Patrick is eager to implement a more methodical approach to integrating foresight into the institutional thinking of his organisation and expanding it to their network. Răzvan advocates for the inclusion of strategic foresight as a fundamental component of strategic planning and proposes incorporating futures thinking and methods into routine meetings, such as a staff retreat. 

Throughout the interviews, Melissa, Patrick, and Răzvan highlighted the growing significance of foresight and anticipation for civil society. They further emphasised the need for taking an integrated approach to futures thinking and making it a regular practice. The perspectives and experiences that they have shared serve as a reminder of the complexity of the issue, the opportunity it presents, and the teamwork needed to address it.

International Civic Forum 2023
International Civic Forum 2023
International Civic Forum 2023
International Civic Forum 2023 where forty civil society professionals met to workshop on anticipating futures.

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, check out Anticipating futures for civil society operating space – Solidarity Action Network (SANE). The International Civil Society Centre’s three-year initiative (2022 – 2025) focussing on strengthening anticipatory capacities and future readiness of civil society professionals who are working to defend and expand civic and civil society operating space. The ICF methodology was co-developed by the ICSCentre and Forum for the Future, with support of Patricia Mugenzi.

Communications Manager

International Civil Society Centre


The Global Standard for CSO Accountability – An intense and participatory journey

14th December 2023 by Anabel Cruz and Miriam Niehaus

Almost exactly 10 years ago during the Global Perspectives conference in Johannesburg, South Africa, hosted by the International Civil Society Centre and CIVICUS, colleagues from AccountableNow (back then the INGO Accountability Charter), InterAction, Rendir Cuentas and VANI introduced an idea: to establish a Global Standard for CSO accountability. An idea developed into a global partnership driving a paradigm shift from reporting on accountability, mainly for donors’ sake, to Dynamic Accountability. The Global Standard has been developed as a tool for strengthened impact and resilience by becoming more transparent, responsive, ethical and accountable towards the people whom we work for and with. By now the Global Standard is both a tool for organisations to showcase their accountability and with strengthened integrity withstand attacks design to shrinking civic space, as well as a means to shift power in the mechanisms of programme and strategy development.   

The partnership’s story is one of exemplary global collaboration between regional and national CSO network organisations that worked very hard to achieve an agreed vision for accountability and then implement and translate it to their local context.  With the support of Sida Sweden, several project partners from all corners of the world initially came together to develop the Global Standard: AccountableNow, the Australian Council for International Development (ACFID), the Balkan Civil Society Development Network (BCSDN), the Cooperation Committee for Cambodia (CCC), Deniva, InterAction, the International Civil Society Centre, Rendir Cuentas, Viwango, and the Voluntary Action network India (VANI), later to be joined by the Pacific Island Association of Non-Governmental Organisations (PIANGO), the PHE Ethiopia Consortium, and the West Africa Civil Society Institute (WACSI). In December 2017 the Global Standard for CSO Accountability was officially launched at the CIVICUS International Civil Society Week in Fiji. Now, ten years on from its inception, the global collaboration has been able to develop into a full cooperative and independent Partnership that will continue working with the sector in its ever important drive to more and better accountability. Future activities include continuing with the implementation of the Global Standard, and supporting CSOs to strengthen their accountability practices by fostering more horizontal and dynamically accountable relationships between CSOs and actors like donors, governments, and international organisations.  

Though no longer institutionally involved the International Civil Society Centre is proud to have been part of the journey of this important initiative and looks forward to its next steps.  

 

Global Standard Global Standard

Global Standard Partners 2018

 

Anabel Cruz

Director and Coordinator

Institute for Communication and Development (ICD) and Regional Initiative Rendir Cuentas

Anabel Cruz is originally from Uruguay and has three decades of experience in civil society promotion, research, and training in Latin America and in the global context. She is the Founder Director of the Institute for Communication and Development (ICD) in Uruguay and has been a consultant and evaluator for international organizations, a trainer and facilitator and a visiting lecturer at universities in several countries. She is an expert on topics related to citizen participation, civil society transparency, accountability, and good governance. She has a long working experience with local, national, regional, and global CSO networks and platforms promoting transparency and accountability of civil society and other stakeholders, leading international research, and coordinating the efforts of organizations to implement common standards, and models for accountability mechanisms. She has been the Board Chair of CIVICUS, the World Alliance for Citizen Participation in two different periods (2007-2010 and 2016-2019). She led the creation in 2009, and is since then the co-coordinator of Rendir Cuentas, a Regional Civil Society Accountability Initiative, with active CSO members and partners in 12 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Anabel is currently the Civil Society Co-Chair of the Open Government Partnership (OGP) Steering Committee.

Miriam Niehaus

Head of Programmes

International Civil Society Centre

Miriam leads the Centre’s programmes. She started at the Centre as Executive Assistant in 2014 and then, as Project Manager, developed and implemented the Centre’s projects on civic space between 2016 and 2019. Prior to joining the Centre Miriam worked for VSO International and GIZ in the Palestinian Territories. She holds a BA in Islamic Studies and Social Anthropology from the University of Freiburg and an MA in Near and Middle Eastern Studies from the School of Oriental and African Studies.