Never waste a good crisis

12th March 2025 by Wolfgang Jamann

The decisions of the new US administration to freeze aid and abolish USAID has sent shockwaves through the system. USA is the largest bilateral ODA (Official Development Assistance) donor, and this decision is already having significant impact, both within the US (job losses, cutback on domestic programs) and abroad (communities not receiving medical aid, local NGOs having to cease operations, fragile and poor countries expecting significant economic impact). 

Other donors have taken similar steps – the Netherlands has cut aid by 30%, redirecting funds to projects that directly contribute to Dutch interests. Belgium cut aid by 25%, while France reduced its budget by 37%. Swedish SIDA has linked its foreign aid strategy closer to Swedish interests and prohibits the use of their funding for political advocacy in ODA countries. Most recently, the UK has decided to reduce foreign aid by 40% while raising defense spending. Germany’s new government might be next in line, having to raise military spending significantly and possibly preparing financially for larger numbers of Ukrainian refugees. 

Linking aid cuts to increasing military funding is only one, yet problematic, relationship. We can also see the increasing instrumentalization of foreign aid to security, external policy, and economic interests of donor countries. Furthermore, the ‘value-based’ or ‘rights-based’ development cooperation is under direct attack by those who are propagating a regressive and chauvinistic world view, in which NGOs and civil society are seen as principal opponents. 

Acknowledging that the victims of these developments will be first and foremost the poorest and most vulnerable of this world, we also need to understand the long-term impact on the ‘sector’. What do these developments mean for civil society, and for ICSOs in particular? 

Five weeks after the first Executive Orders by President Trump, some consequences can already be drawn. 

  • It can safely be assumed that globally, there will be less foreign aid available for a long time to come. 
  • Aid will be more closely linked to geopolitics, global trade relations, security concerns and few immediate global threats (though the latter might be questionable, thinking of the ambivalent actions towards pandemics). Climate change and biodiversity loss might receive even less attention.  
  • Aid might be ‘regionalised’, for example, focused on immediate spheres of influence of big donor countries (e.g. US aid may be focused on Central America)  
  • Aid might be focused on alleviating humanitarian crises, particularly high-profile ones.  
  • Institutions (the UN, other multilaterals, but also NGOs) will be in defence over their value, legitimacy, effectiveness and the difference they make. 
  • The ‘localisation’ agenda might get new, unexpected pushes in the direction of cost cutting, local ownership and local financing / fundraising.  
  • Recipient countries might take this as a call for greater self-sustainability (positive scenario) or leave the most vulnerable communities behind (negative scenario). 

(I)CSOs are in the middle of this. The values on which their work rests are under attack. As institutions they might be singled out by anti-rights actors. Their business models are threatened, particularly those NGOs who take significant government funding. And the legitimacy of international actors is under scrutiny, from many sides. The push to ‘localise’ and shift power comes from Southern civil society, and Southern and Northern governments alike.    

Disrupt and innovate,’ has been the slogan of the Centre since its inception. When there’s disruption, and resilience is low, things will have to change. It is clear that there are some fundamental shortcomings in the sector, in spite of the many good deeds that have been delivered through the aid system  for the time it has been existing. Here are some ideas on how to make use of the crisis. 

  • Aid flows from North to South increase (or perpetuate) dependency. Can there be more radical support to those who want to overcome such dependency, e.g. through supporting local fundraising, transferring power of decision-making in project planning, positively sanctioning self-funded initiatives, investing in institution building, creating solidarity funds? 
  • (I)NGOs have an overriding concern for their organisational success. Can they develop the ambition (and practice) to work themselves out of the job? What would this mean for defining leaders’ success? 
  • Accountability over funds is the holy grail for those who don’t want to shift decision powers. Can we prioritise non-monetary accountability dimensions? And can we lobby donors to adjust their expectations? 
  • There is duplication throughout the sector. Should there not be many more mergers, job-share, cross-sectoral collaboration? Can we be more rigorous about added value provided? 
  • Social business, social impact investing, effective philanthropy, must not be seen as distinguished from CSO work. Are we intentional enough about such initiatives, and about bringing corporates into our ecosystem? 
  • The international aid system is expensive. Country office structures and expats living and working in the global South are costly, they narrow development spaces for local talents, and undermine just tax systems. Can we work more with local staff capacities and service providers? 
  • In many cases, partners are implementers or sub-contractors. How do partnership relations be re-defined and re-lived to change who is in the drivers’ seat? 
  • There’s been more and more calls for system changes, to bring the sector from its head onto its feet. Will leaders (and governors) of civil society organisations take this as a positive challenge? And do they believe in the quest for a change of the international aid system? 

The above are just a few areas where more serious discussion and actions are needed. The sector has already developed several promising initiatives, like RINGO, the Pledge for Change, and the Dynamic Accountability Framework, which may need a significant push for commitment. What could other areas be where leaders in the sector invest collectively, to make good use of the crisis at hand? 

Let us know! 

Wolfgang Jamann

Executive Director

International Civil Society Centre

Dr. Wolfgang Jamann is Executive Director of the International Civil Society Centre. Until January 2018 he was Secretary General and CEO of CARE International (Geneva). Before that he led NGO Deutsche Welthungerhilfe and the Alliance 2015, a partnership of 7 European aid organisations. From 2004-2009 he was CEO & Board member of CARE Deutschland-Luxemburg and President of the CARE Foundation. Previously, he worked for World Vision International as a regional representative in East Africa (Kenya) & Head of Humanitarian Assistance at WV Germany. After his Ph.D. dissertation in 1990 he started his career in development work at the German Foundation for International Development, later for the UNDP in Zambia. As a researcher and academic, he has published books and articles on East & Southeast Asia contributing to international studies on complex humanitarian emergencies and conflict management.


Anticipating Futures of Volunteering: Insights from Budapest’s Foresight Workshop

26th February 2025 by Eva Gondor

In early February, we were invited to facilitate a foresight workshop in Budapest, Hungary, as part of a study session on “New Trends in International Voluntary Service” (IVS). Organised by the Coordinating Committee for International Voluntary Service (CCIVS), the Alliance of European Voluntary Service Organisations, International Cultural Youth Exchange (ICYE), Service Civil International (SCI), and the Network for Voluntary Development in Asia (NVDA), in collaboration with the Council of Europe, the study session aimed to explore emerging trends in IVS and strengthen participants’ ability to anticipate and respond to future challenges in volunteering and youth work.

A group of 30 young professionals from around the world, representing international voluntary networks and organisations, gathered at the European Youth Centre in Budapest to explore the future of international volunteering through the lens of futures thinking. While this methodology was new to many participants, it was embraced with great interest and enthusiasm. The Centre’s experience with futures thinking, particularly through our “Scanning the Horizon” community and the “Anticipating futures for civil society operating space” initiative, provided a solid foundation for guiding participants in applying foresight tools to their own contexts.

Photo 1_IVS Blog_ Participants group photo by Tavares Ferreira

Exploring Trends Shaping the Future of Volunteering 

The study session was guided by our “Toolkit for tomorrow: Anticipating civil society futures,” a resource we designed to help (international) civil society organisations strengthen their ability to anticipate future challenges, practice foresight, and build resilience. Through group discussions, participants explored key trends likely to shape IVS over the next decade, such as decolonisation, climate injustice, artificial intelligence, and the rise of new social movements. The importance of thinking ahead was central to the event, as one participant noted: 

“We should already start planning based on future trends and not only focus on the current ones.”

To dive deeper into how these trends might impact the future, the participants were tasked with narrowing down a long list of trends to two key issues that they believed would most significantly influence IVS by 2035. Their choices were: 

  • Climate injustice – Ongoing environmental degradation, extreme weather events, and resource insecurity will disproportionately affect certain regions and vulnerable groups, exacerbating existing inequalities. 
  • Voluntourism demands – Volunteers prioritising personal travel experiences over genuine contributions to community work will shape the future of volunteering. 

Photo 6_IVS Blog_Tavares Ferreira

Crafting Scenarios for 2035: From Volun-Caring to Volun-Collapse 

Creating future scenarios allows organisations to step beyond current assumptions and envision a wide range of possible outcomes, helping them prepare for uncertainty and make more proactive decisions. In the workshop, participants used a 2×2 matrix, a widely-used scenario-building tool, to explore how two key trends – voluntourism demands and climate injustice from a decolonial perspective – could unfold by 2035. By examining the interplay between high and low impacts of these trends, they developed four distinct scenarios for IVS: 

 2x2 matrix, a widely-used scenario-building tool_Budapest workshop

The crafted scenarios provided vivid insights into where volunteering could be headed, depending on how these trends play out. They encouraged participants to reflect on how these futures might be similar or different from today. As one participant put it: 

“Considering different possible futures could actually show us how close we are to some of them.”

Photo 5_IVS Blog_ Participants_photo by Tavares Ferreira

Shaping the Future: Taking Action 

The scenario workshop sparked great enthusiasm, and many participants expressed a desire to continue exploring and applying futures thinking in their own organisations and community work. The session inspired participants to think about the future in new ways, question their assumptions and biases, and embrace diverse experience and perspectives when imagining futures. As one participant reflected: 

“There is hope to solve the upcoming problems. Through discussions and different points of view, we can get concrete ideas about future opportunities.” 

The following day, the group brainstormed actions that IVS organisations could take to address the challenges and opportunities identified in the scenarios. They discussed ideas such as partnering with educational institutions and humanitarian organisations, learning from grassroots social movements, embracing social entrepreneurship, and decentralising structures. A follow-up session will take place in a few months to assess how these ideas have evolved into concrete projects. 

Photo 4_IVS Blog_ Participants_photo by Tavares Ferreira

Embracing Futures Thinking 

Overall, the workshop underscored the value of futures thinking in helping to anticipate potential challenges and opportunities, empowering people to make better decisions today. Participants left with a deeper understanding of their own agency in navigating undesired futures and working towards preferred outcomes. As political theorist John Schaar once said:

“The future is not some place we are going to, but one we are creating.”

Photo 3_IVS Blog_ Participants_photo by Tavares Ferreira


Inspired to Explore Futures Thinking for Yourself?

If you’re interested in learning more about how to apply futures thinking, check out our “Toolkit for tomorrow: Anticipating civil society futures.” This step-by-step guide takes readers through trend scanning, scenario building, and action planning. Originally published in English, the toolkit is now also available in French and Spanish. 

Feel free to get in touch to explore ways we can collaborate on futures thinking. 


Photos by Tavares Ferreira, Youth Department of the Council of Europe

Eva Gondor

Senior Project Manager

International Civil Society Centre

Eva leads on the Centre's civic space work - the Solidarity Action Network (SANE) aimed at strengthening resilience of and solidarity among civil society actors, and the International Civic Forum (ICF), our annual civic space platform to network and identify opportunities for collaboration. Prior to joining the Centre she worked at the Robert Bosch Stiftung (Foundation) in Stuttgart where she managed the foundation’s projects focusing on civil society and governance in Turkey, the Western Balkans, and North Africa.


Trends and Signals for Policy Makers

25th February 2025 by Rachel Wilkinson

Earlier this month, our Director of Programmes, Rachel Wilkinson, was invited to speak to EU policy makers to share the Centre’s work on strategic foresight, signals and trends. The European Strategy and Policy Analysis System (ESPAS) is an inter-institutional collaboration among the officials of the European Commission, the European Parliament, the Council of the EU, and the European External Action Service, with the support of the Committee of the Regions and of the European Economic and Social Committee. It monitors global trends and offers strategic foresight to the EU’s decision-makers. The meeting saw policy makers from across all EU institutions come together and learn about trends and discuss their possible implications.

The value of futures thinking  

Futures thinking can help us navigate uncertainty by revealing the interplay of dynamic trends, identifying risks, opportunities, and innovations, and creating a collective vision for the future. At the Centre, we have been promoting futures thinking to civil society organisations for many years. Scanning the Horizon is our established collaborative platform for trend scouting and analysis in the international civil society sector. It includes leading ICSOs, national CSO umbrella organisations, philanthropy, and futurists. Members utilise futures skills and methods to shape and adapt their strategies. From this community and other programmatic work on futures thinking, such as our toolkit for tomorrow, we have developed futures resources to support civil society. 

It is important for civil society to have a voice and be included in conversations with policy makers. At the Centre, we bring forward different perspectives and can share a global view of trends and signals. At the gathering of ESPAS, we had a unique opportunity to share our approach on futures thinking and the methods we use to develop futures thinking resources, such as trends mapping and signal spotting, through which we seek diverse inputs and ask critical questions to challenging our assumptions about the signals and trends we see emerging. 

Taking a participatory approach to futures thinking  

We take a participatory approach to our futures thinking. This allows for more inclusive and transformative futures to emerge, enabling out-of-the-box thinking with diverse input building upon our past experiences. By seeking a broader range of opinions and situations from a global perspective, we enable more inclusive and transformative futures to emerge. For policymakers, these wider perspectives ensure the implications on civil society organisations are better understood and more robust and future-proof policies are developed. 

Trends and Signals  

Our recent work highlights several key trends impacting the civic space. This includes Mis, Dis, and Mal information: AI-driven manipulation, erosion of trust in public institutions, and the rise of opinion engineering through social media. These trends can harm trust, democracy, and social cohesion, and CSOs need tools and strategies to address mitigating these effects. 

Our work on anticipating futures examined trends on civic space. Key trends in this area are the increase in global conflicts, crises of multilateralism, tech solutionism, the influence of corporations, securitisation, disinformation, demographic shifts, growing inequalities, and climate injustice. All these interlinking and overarching themes need to be addressed to strengthen civic space. How we react to these challenges is vital for maintaining social stability, promoting human rights, and upholding the rule of law within the EU and globally. 

CSOs and Futures Thinking 

In an increasingly uncertain world, CSOs must look beyond immediate challenges and consider the long-term possibilities that could shape their work. Strategic foresight and futures thinking enable CSOs to make better decisions today about tomorrow.
Rapid changes are adversely affecting CSOs and the communities we serve, making it essential to adopt a proactive and forward-thinking approach. By considering various possible futures and recognising key signals of change, CSOs can build resilience and agility. This strategic mindset not only enhances decision-making but also ensures that CSOs remain adaptable in an ever-evolving landscape.

For more information about our futures work and that of the ESPAS please see:  

      Rachel Wilkinson

      Programme Manager – Futures and Innovation

      International Civil Society Centre

      Rachel leads the Futures and Innovation programme at the Centre. She is responsible for managing the portfolio of projects and events as well as leading and developing the Scanning the Horizon strategic peer learning platform. Rachel has more than 15 years of experience working in the third sector, on a national and international level, working for various ICSOs in international development and human rights in both London and Berlin.


      Scanning the Horizon: Exploring futures with Horizon 2045

      12th February 2025 by Alexandra Schlegel

      In a world defined by complexity – climate crises, technological revolutions and geo-political shifts – how do we move beyond reacting to today’s problems to proactively preparing for the future? At a recent Scanning the Horizon community session, we turned to the Horizon 2045 Foresight Radar, a cutting-edge tool, to explore this question. The session was facilitated by our member Climate-KIC along with Horizon 2045. 

       

      The session introduced the Horizon 2045 Foresight Radar – a participatory tool that maps signals of change across seven broad themes, from technology and geo-politics to the environment and social dynamics. What sets it apart is its ability to go beyond cataloguing trends, instead inviting users to explore interconnections, imagine plausible scenarios, and engage in collaborative, systems-level thinking. 

      As we delved into the radar during the session, participants were struck by the diversity and scale of signals it tracks – more than 500 spanning the globe. It challenged us to ask: How do these signals connect? What stories do they tell about the future? And how can we act on them? 

      One breakout activity, “Radar Roulette”, was a playful yet revealing exercise. Participants explored random signals on the radar and debated their implications. Whether discussing advancements in AI or shifts in global health governance. 

      For CSOs, the radar can be a practical tool. Futures thinking equips organisations to step out of crisis-response mode and adopt longer-term, systemic approaches. The session reinforced that horizon scanning can help CSOs to spot early signals of disruption or opportunity for transformation, build adaptive strategies that are flexible to change, and strengthen collaboration by connecting diverse actors across disciplines and geographies.  

      Push and pull of futures triangle diagram
      Source: Inayatullah, S. (2008) Six Pillars: Futures Thinking for Transforming Foresight, 10(1): 4-21.

      For civil society organisations, the Horizon 2045 Foresight Radar is more than just an intellectual exercise – it’s a transformative tool. Futures thinking empowers organisations to step out of reactive, crisis-response modes and adopt long-term, systemic strategies. The session underscored that horizon scanning helps (I)CSOs identify early signals of disruption or opportunity, craft flexible and adaptive strategies, and foster collaboration across disciplines and geographies. By using the radar, (I)CSOs can make informed decisions today that will pave the way for a more resilient and equitable tomorrow. 

      Let’s use tools such as the Horizon 2045 Foresight Radar to anticipate challenges, seize opportunities, and build a future that works for both people and the planet. Together, we can move beyond merely reacting to crises and instead create strategies that transform and inspire. 


      Links

      Feature image: Adapted still of the Horizon 2045 Foresight Radar designed by Pupul Bisht.

      Alexandra Schlegel

      Programme and Events Officer

      International Civil Society Centre

      Alexandra joined the Centre in January 2022. Her background is in Political Science and International Relations. She holds a MA in International Relations from Leiden University in the Netherlands next to her BA in Political Science and History from the University of Tübingen, Germany. In her master thesis, Alexandra wrote about the humanitarian impacts of migration agreements. During her studies, she was strongly engaged in voluntary work with different international organisations. She has lived in Germany, the UK, the Netherlands as well as Jordan and is currently living in Berlin.


      Shaping the Future of Civil Society: Reflections from the YMCA Accelerator Summit

      12th December 2024 by Myriam Ciza Gambini and Eva Gondor

      In October, Myriam Ciza Gambini and Eva Gondor, had the opportunity to contribute to, and participate in the YMCA Accelerator Summit, taking place in Mombasa, Kenya. The Summit brought together over 450 people from 60 countries and aimed to accelerate YMCA’s Vision 2030, which serves as a roadmap for YMCA’s strategic objectives, aligned with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Like many of its peers, YMCA is grappling with existential questions about its future and relevance in the civil society landscape. This event marked the first of its kind for YMCA, designed to create spaces for exchange, discussion, and collaboration within the movement. 

      The Summit gathered YMCA delegates, international and local civil society partners, and private sector stakeholders to address key issues such as sustainability, youth employment, partnerships for impact as well as racial and youth justice. 

      Foresights workshop at Myriam and panellists at YMCA Accelerator Summit
      Eva Gondor facilitating the foresight workshop at the Summit

      Exploring Strategic Foresight: Anticipating Possible Futures

      At the Summit, we facilitated a foresight workshop based on our recently published “Toolkit for tomorrow: Anticipating civil society futures,” exploring how to prepare for and shape possible futures. The session aimed to help participants understand the value of futures thinking and foresight, craft possible future scenarios, and identify practical actions to address them. Futures thinking invites us to imagine a range of possible futures, enabling us to anticipate upcoming changes and better prepare for them today. Strategic foresight takes this a step further by using these future possibilities to guide decision-making and planning. During the workshop, participants explored trends affecting the civil society landscape, identifying growing inequality and climate injustice as key issues likely to have a significant impact by 2030. They then developed future scenarios that reflected the interplay of these two trends. By the end of the session, participants outlined actions to address these scenarios, such as strengthening advocacy efforts, working more closely with local communities, and prioritising long-term goals over short-term gains. After the workshop, several attendees expressed an interest in experimenting further with futures thinking. 

      YMCA Powershift panel
      Myriam Ciza Gambini took speaking at the plenary panel “Powershift in the Agenda for a Just World”

      Powershift in the Agenda for a Just World 

      In addition, Myriam Ciza Gambini took part in the plenary panel “Powershift in the Agenda for a Just World,” alongside Sunita Suna, Executive Secretary for Programs, Asia and Pacific Alliance of YMCAs and Mathias Shipeta, Rapid Response Officer at Haki Africa. The discussion focused on power dynamics in the sector, viewed through a Global North-South lens as well as a gender-inclusive, human rights perspective. Panellists explored how to foster an enabling environment for power shift, the role of citizen activism in changing the power hierarchy, and the opportunities it presents for social impact leaders. The panel was followed by a deep-dive session with the audience, discussing how organisations like YMCA can address internal power dynamics and contribute to a paradigm shift in the sector. 

      Myriam and panellists at YMCA Accelerator Summit
      Myriam Ciza Gambini and plenary panel colleagues

      Final Thoughts: Strengthening Ecosystems 

      Throughout the week, discussions also centred on how to connect grassroots initiatives and local partners with global movements in a meaningful and non-extractive way, fostering ecosystem strengthening. Several sessions explored how governance still represents a key challenge in ensuring the adequate representation of the communities that organisations like YMCA serve. It was inspiring to learn about their efforts to diversify boards and decision-making bodies. 

      The Summit gave us a unique opportunity to witness the scope and influence of the global YMCA movement. We look forward to continuing our collaboration with YMCA in their mission to empower communities and young people worldwide, building a just, sustainable, and inclusive future. 

      Myriam Ciza Gambini

      Project Manager

      International Civil Society Centre

      Myriam coordinates the “Accelerating Inclusive Power Shift” project, which aims to foster equitable partnerships and more inclusive governance models in the development and humanitarian sectors. Prior to joining the Centre, she worked on EU development policy in Brussels for CONCORD and Humanity & Inclusion and with CBM in Italy.

      Eva Gondor

      Senior Project Manager

      International Civil Society Centre

      Eva leads on the Centre's civic space work - the Solidarity Action Network (SANE) aimed at strengthening resilience of and solidarity among civil society actors, and the International Civic Forum (ICF), our annual civic space platform to network and identify opportunities for collaboration. Prior to joining the Centre she worked at the Robert Bosch Stiftung (Foundation) in Stuttgart where she managed the foundation’s projects focusing on civil society and governance in Turkey, the Western Balkans, and North Africa.


      Navigating the Digital Landscape: Key Insights from the International Civic Forum 2024

      12th December 2024 by Eva Gondor and Rachel Wilkinson
      Every year, we bring together leaders from civil society and other sectors to discuss key civic space issues, build connections, and identify opportunities for collaboration at the International Civic Forum (ICF). This year we focused on how digital technology is transforming civic space and explored the implications of digital advancement for civic and civil society operating space.   

       

      ICF 2024_ holding a phone and taking a photo of a speaker

       

      Collaborating with our partner, the Civic Tech Innovation Network (CTIN), with whom we run our Digital Dialogues event series, we built on synergies and teamed up for their annual conference Civic Tech Innovation Forum (CTIF). At CTIF we hosted a masterclass on how strategic foresight can be applied by civil society to address misinformation and disinformation. The ICF took place immediately following the CTIF, fostering connections between the two events and providing a unique platform to share knowledge and insights.  

      During the ICF, we examined how digital trends – ranging from digital authoritarianism and disinformation to the growing role of artificial intelligence (AI) – are reshaping civic space. Participants explored the challenges and opportunities that technology presents, shared experiences and best practices, and engaged in a foresight exercise to prepare for possible civic space futures. 

       

      ICF 2024 Panel Presentation

       

      Key Learnings and Reflections from the ICF 2024

      1. Impact of digital technology on (shrinking) civic space

      Civic space is increasingly under threat, with the rise of government surveillance, internet shutdowns, and restrictions on digital freedoms. Digital technology plays a dual role – it can contribute to the erosion of civic freedoms but also provide new tools for civil society to fight back. 

      For example, technology can help expose human rights violations, amplify voices, and facilitate global advocacy and coalition-building. However, it also opens the door for new forms of digital repression, such as targeted disinformation campaigns and government surveillance. As we move forward, civil society organisations must engage with technology critically and actively manage its risks, while recognising its potential to drive positive change.

      ICF 2024 _ group discussion

       

      2. The need to prioritise and upskill on cybersecurity

      Civil society organisations are now among the most targeted groups for cyberattacks. Whether large or small, they must prioritise cybersecurity to protect sensitive data and safeguard digital infrastructures. They need to stay informed about emerging digital threats and continually upskill staff to address them. This is not just a technical issue – it’s a fundamental aspect of protecting the work we do and the communities we serve. 

      3. Bridging the digital divide and enabling accessibility

      While digital technology offers incredible opportunities, we cannot overlook the global digital divide. Over 3 billion people remain offline, and many others face restrictions due to financial barriers or internet shutdowns. For civil society organisations looking to use technology to support and expand civic space, it is essential to ensure that digital solutions are inclusive and accessible. This includes offering offline versions of apps, ensuring data protection, and providing access to free tools like VPNs to overcome censorship. 

       

      ICF - Robert Dersley collecting content for graphic illustration

       

      4. Need for collective learning and collaboration

      A central theme throughout the ICF was the importance of collaboration. Technology is constantly evolving, and staying ahead of emerging trends requires continuous learning and knowledge-sharing. This way, we can build on each other’s efforts instead of reinventing the wheel. From managing digital risks to understanding the impacts of AI, civil society organisations must take collective responsibility for building a more tech-savvy and resilient sector.

      5. Artificial intelligence (AI) as a double-edged sword

      AI has significant potential to support human rights and democracy, but it also comes with considerable risks. From privacy violations to the amplification of disinformation, the ICF underscored the need for vigilance. Civil society organisations must explore AI’s potential, for example for fact-checking and verifying information. At the same time, they must actively mitigate its risks, such as biased algorithms, and ensure that its deployment promotes fairness, inclusivity, and respect for human rights.

       

      ICF presentation discussion

       

      6. Anticipating possible futures for civic space

      Strategic foresight helps civil society organisations anticipate and prepare for a range of future scenarios, allowing them to navigate potential changes in civic space more effectively. By exploring scenarios for 2030 – from civic space collapse to its transformation – participants identified first steps that civil society can take to respond to emerging digital trends. This proactive approach enables civil society organisations to strengthen resilience and adaptability, ensuring they are ready for multiple possible futures and can safeguard civic freedoms in an ever-changing environment. 


      Final thoughts

      In conclusion, the ICF emphasised that civil society has a responsibility to engage with digital technology and critically assess its impact, both positive and negative, on civic space. The digital tools we engage with should be used to amplify voices, protect human rights, and strengthen civic space. By understanding the digital landscape, advocating for responsible use of AI, strengthening cybersecurity, and closing the digital divide, civil society organisations can ensure technology remains a force for positive change, rather than one that undermines civic space. Through ongoing exchange, upskilling, collaboration, and strategic foresight, civil society can adapt to the digital age and continue defending and expanding civic space for a fairer and more resilient future. 


      ICF participants 2024
      Participants at the International Civic Forum 2024

      Photos by Zibusiso Manzini-Moyo


      International Civic Forum 2024 Graphic Illustration Recording

      Day 1
      International Civic Forum _Graphic Recording Day 1 by Robert Dersley
      Illustration by Robert Dersley, 2024

      Click here to view larger version

      Day 2
      International Civic Forum _Graphic Recording Day 2 by Robert Dersley
      Illustration by Robert Dersley, 2024

      Click here to view larger version

      ICF Graphic illustratotor in action Robert Dersley
      Robert Dersley in action, graphic recording

      Eva Gondor

      Senior Project Manager

      International Civil Society Centre

      Eva leads on the Centre's civic space work - the Solidarity Action Network (SANE) aimed at strengthening resilience of and solidarity among civil society actors, and the International Civic Forum (ICF), our annual civic space platform to network and identify opportunities for collaboration. Prior to joining the Centre she worked at the Robert Bosch Stiftung (Foundation) in Stuttgart where she managed the foundation’s projects focusing on civil society and governance in Turkey, the Western Balkans, and North Africa.

      Rachel Wilkinson

      Programme Manager – Futures and Innovation

      International Civil Society Centre

      Rachel leads the Futures and Innovation programme at the Centre. She is responsible for managing the portfolio of projects and events as well as leading and developing the Scanning the Horizon strategic peer learning platform. Rachel has more than 15 years of experience working in the third sector, on a national and international level, working for various ICSOs in international development and human rights in both London and Berlin.


      Insights and Foresights: Learning on Mis-, Dis-, and Malinformation’ Series

      12th December 2024 by Rachel Wilkinson

      In today’s rapidly evolving information ecosystem, misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation poses significant threats to civil society organisations (CSOs). Recognising the urgency of this issue and the specific ways CSOs are impacted and targeted by polluted information, the International Civil Society Centre launched: Insights and Foresights Learning on Mis-, Dis-, and Malinformation. It examines current and emerging challenges facing civil society, implications from new digital technologies, as well as exploring new approaches and opportunities for CSOS to tackle mis, dis, and malinformation.   

      Focusing on current insights and learnings on the information ecosystem, the series raises awareness of this growing challenge and the multifaced ways it affects civil society along with suggesting effective approaches for the sector to tackle these challenges. The project used strategic foresight methods to delve deeper into the issue and to look ahead to possible futures on misinformation, disinformation and malinformation and what that could this mean for civil society organisations. Asking questions, mapping trends, emerging signals and posing alternative scenarios.    

       Watch our explainer video here: 

      YouTube

      By loading the video, you agree to YouTube’s privacy policy.
      Learn more

      Load video

      This series of pieces showcases the scope of the project’s findings, including:

      • Pioneering Approaches: Four case studies from CSOs tackling misinformation and disinformation.
      • A Futures Approach to Tackle Mis-, Dis-, and Malinformation: Exploring the importance and methodology of foresight to combat false information.
      • Trends Mapping: Analysis of political, economic, social, and technological trends in mis-, dis-, and malinformation, from current realities to future developments.
      • Scenarios: Four future scenarios for 2030, based on varying levels of regulation and CSO engagement.
      • Video Explainer: A visual summary of the effects of mis-, dis-, and malinformation.
      • Malinformation Article: Malinformation: A Nuanced and Critical Concern for Civil Society.
      • OECD Elections Article: The Stakes for Democracy: Tackling Disinformation and Promoting Electoral Integrity, highlighting the effects of mis-, dis-, and malinformation on democratic systems.
      • Islamic Relief Article: Islamic Relief Worldwide’s Strategic Response to Tackle Mis-, Dis-, and Malinformation, highlighting the organisation’s experiences with these threats.
      • Wikimedia Article (upcoming): Wikimedia’s Approach to Generative AI and Misinformation.

      With this series, the Centre provides a comprehensive guide for CSOs navigating the complex and dynamic threats of mis-, dis-, and malinformation in the digital age.


      View the series resource page here 


      Watch our session at Global Perspectives 2024 introducing the series

      YouTube

      By loading the video, you agree to YouTube’s privacy policy.
      Learn more

      Load video

      Rachel Wilkinson

      Programme Manager – Futures and Innovation

      International Civil Society Centre

      Rachel leads the Futures and Innovation programme at the Centre. She is responsible for managing the portfolio of projects and events as well as leading and developing the Scanning the Horizon strategic peer learning platform. Rachel has more than 15 years of experience working in the third sector, on a national and international level, working for various ICSOs in international development and human rights in both London and Berlin.


      Citizen Data Takes Centre Stage at the Fifth UN World Data Forum

      11th December 2024 by Ayman Akkad

      In mid-November 2024, Medellín, Colombia, played host to the fifth United Nations World Data Forum (UNWDF). Themed “Datutopia,” the Centre’s Leave No One Behind Partnership attended the Forum alongside over 2,000 participants, including representatives from national statistical offices (NSOs), academia, civil society, and global data partnerships. Over the course of four days, the forum tackled pressing questions about how to create an innovative and inclusive data ecosystem to support sustainable development. 


      Citizen Data: A Cornerstone of Sustainable Development 

       
      One of the event’s standout themes was the transformative potential of citizen data in advancing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Citizen data, a form of crowdsourced information often contributed by individuals through community initiatives, digital platforms, and mobile devices, has proven to be an indispensable complement to traditional statistics. It has become particularly effective in shedding light on the realities of marginalised and underrepresented communities. 

      Examples of its impact abounded. From mapping pollution in urban areas to capturing the social dynamics of hard-to-reach populations, citizen science projects were lauded for addressing gaps where official data sources falter. Crucially, the forum highlighted how such initiatives empower communities to shape their narratives and reclaim agency over how their realities are represented. 
       
      Integrating citizen data into official statistics, panellists argued, could revolutionise decision-making and contribute to a broader “data commons,” a shared and open-access repository that fosters greater inclusivity. 

      A Pivotal Role for the Collaborative on Citizen Data

      Among the key players at UNWDF 2024 was the Collaborative on Citizen Data, a coalition dedicated to advancing the role of citizen-generated data in achieving the SDGs. The Collaborative, co-chaired by the Centre’s Leave No One Behind Partnership, was instrumental in guiding discussions on how citizen data could be effectively harnessed. 
       
      Through its presentations, the Collaborative showcased the Copenhagen Framework on Citizen Data, which serves as a roadmap for implementing such initiatives. Practical examples came from country coalitions of the Centre’s Leave No One Behind Partnership, which illustrated how citizen contributions to the data value chain—from collection to analysis—can address challenges and ensure data reflects society’s diversity. 
       
      Speakers emphasised that mainstreaming citizen data into global and national practices is essential for inclusive development. Their message was clear: sustainable development cannot succeed if it leaves marginalised voices unheard or unrepresented. 

      Innovation and Inclusivity in the Data Landscape 

      UNWDF 2024 was not short on forward-looking ideas. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and geospatial data into the broader data ecosystem took centre stage too, with examples of how these technologies can accelerate analysis and reveal actionable insights. Yet, caution was urged. With AI’s rapid proliferation, participants stressed the importance of adhering to strict ethical standards to ensure transparency and fairness. 
       
      Building a universally accessible data commons also garnered significant attention. Panellists underscored that bridging the gap between technical experts and local communities requires a shared and inclusive language. This vision, though ambitious, is pivotal for ensuring that data-driven decisions genuinely reflect the lived realities of people worldwide. 

      Trust, Ethics, and the Role of Partnerships

      The forum grappled with the thorny issues of data ethics and trust. As citizen data becomes integral to global development strategies, safeguarding privacy and maintaining ethical standards are paramount. Stakeholders debated the responsibilities of governments, private sector, and civil society in ensuring transparency and accountability within this burgeoning ecosystem. 
       
      Equally, many participants rightly championed partnerships as the backbone of a robust data system. Successful collaboration between governments, academia, and grassroots organisations can help avoid duplication, maximise impact, and ultimately build a more equitable data ecosystem. Calls to involve youth more actively in data initiatives reflected a broader ambition to future-proof this movement. 

      Shaping the Global Data Ecosystem: The Road Ahead

      The Medellín Framework for Action, UNWDF 2024’s key outcome document, sets a course for adapting the Cape Town Global Action Plan to the realities of an evolving data landscape. It envisions a future where citizen data, geospatial intelligence, and traditional statistics work in tandem to address global challenges effectively. 
       
      The next forum, scheduled for April 2026 in Saudi Arabia, promises to continue this momentum. With a focus on improving data quality and accessibility, it will include training sessions and competitions for small and medium-sized enterprises to develop innovative data solutions. 
       
      As the curtains closed in Medellín, one lesson stood out: citizen data is no longer a peripheral consideration. It is a cornerstone of modern development strategies, bridging the divide between abstract statistics and the lived realities of individuals. In doing so, it ensures that the often-repeated mantra of the SDGs— “leave no one behind”—becomes a promise fulfilled. 


      Related content

       

      Ayman Akkad

      Project Manager, Leave No One Behind

      International Civil Society Centre

      Ayman is the Project Manager for the Leave No One Behind partnership, at the International Civil Society Centre, joining the Centre in late 2024. With a multidisciplinary background in journalism, development, advocacy and strategic communications, he brings a wide range of experience to this role. He holds a master’s in Conflict Resolution from the Heller School at Brandeis University and a master’s degree in public policy from Princeton’ University’s School of Public and International Affairs. Ayman works towards democratizing policymaking by increasing citizen participation in decision-making and empowering communities to leverage technology for social change.


      Truth and Trust and Technology: Highlights from the Global Perspectives Conference 2024

      11th December 2024 by Rachel Wilkinson

       

       

      Global Perspectives 2024

      On November 26, 2024, the International Civil Society Centre held its annual Global Perspectives Conference, inviting experts and innovators to explore and discuss the theme “Truth, Trust, and Technology” and its significance for Civil Society Organisations (CSOs). This virtual event featured sessions on fighting misinformation and disinformation, building narratives based on trust to uphold human rights, examining the impact of digital technologies on mental health, and leveraging digital technologies for citizen data to allow a voice for marginalised communities. Additionally, the conference addressed deconstructing colonial practices in donor-recipient relationships.  

      The conference kicked off with an opening address from UNDP Administrator Achim Steiner, who stated:

      ‘The use of words to deceive, confuse and provoke are not new. What is new is the sheer speed and intensity with which information, both true and false, now spreads across our digital landscape…in a world of splintering truth and diminishing trust, how can civil society, and by extension our global family, cooperate toward a sustainable and more just future for all?’’ 

      This was followed by a compelling opening plenary on the pervasive issues of misinformation and disinformation. Expert leaders in the sector, underscored the indispensable role of civil society organisations (CSOs) in maintaining trustworthy information ecosystems. The discussions highlighted the necessity of responsible technology use, emphasising trust, accountability, and governance in the digital realm. The panel also explored intergenerational engagement and the potential of technology to foster human progress, stressing the importance of partnership and cooperation in building a hopeful future.

      The second session focused on forging partnerships rooted in trust and solidarity to move forward localisation for ICSOs. Speakers shared insights on moving beyond colonial approaches and quantitative metrics, advocating for power shifts to local levels. The dialogue emphasised the importance of trust, vulnerability, and rethinking power dynamics to uplift communities effectively.

      We were delighted to have a special addition to our monthly Digital Dialogue series as part of Global Perspectives. The panel discussed the impact digitalisation has on mental health, particularly in the context of work, and examined the ways in which digital technology could play a part in mental health support. The expert speakers highlighted the challenges and opportunities of digital technology in supporting mental health, advocating for comprehensive approaches to integrating digital tools, while maintaining privacy, into broader wellbeing strategies for CSOs.

      The adverse effects of misinformation and disinformation are huge for CSOs and we need to mitigate its impact critically. Futures thinking is one method to do this. Futures thinking is a key area for the Centre and an approach and methodology we feel benefits CSOs greatly. Our session on futures thinking approaches, reflected on why CSOs should use strategic foresight in their work, showcasing some new strategic foresight resources we have developed on misinformation, disinformation and malinformation.

      Currently we see civic space shrinking and an increase in anti-rights narratives. This session on building effective narratives, provided strategies for countering  these harmful narratives and promoting human rights. The discussion focused on the importance of framing messages that resonate with audience values and foster collaboration across organisations. The session concluded with the importance of building a global movement and how digital approaches can help foster trust, inclusion, and better human rights.

      The last session of the day showcased the Leave No One Behind Initiative, who focus on leveraging citizen-generated data to empower marginalised communities. Panellists discussed challenges related to data quality, governance, and privacy, emphasising trust and community ownership. The role of philanthropy and the potential of AI in promoting social good were also highlighted.

      The Global Perspectives Conference 2024 was a vibrant convergence of ideas and best practices, featuring diverse participants from international CSOs, politics, and beyond. The online format enabled broad participation, with over 1,000 registered participants, offering global perspectives and inclusive discussions.

      The map below shows the diverse range of cities around the world participants joined us from:

      Global Perspectives participation map

       

      This year’s conference not only underscored the importance of truth and trust but also provided actionable insights for CSOs to navigate today’s complex online information landscape. As we look towards 2025, it is crucial for CSOs to continue fostering trust, embracing innovative solutions, and collaborating across sectors to address global challenges.


      You watch all the session recordings here 


      We have put together a number of additional resources related to each session for you to delve into deeper.

      Session 1 – Civil Society at a Crossroads

      📹 Watch now


      Session 2 – Risk-sharing and Accountability for the Future of the Sector: Beyond Theory 

      📹 Watch now

      📝 Resources:


      Session 3 – Mental Health in the Digital Age: How are civil society organisations using technology to advocate for mental well-being? 

      📹 Watch now

      📝 Resources:


      Session 4 – Foresights and Insights on Misinformation, Disinformation and Malinformation: using Futures thinking approaches for CSOs

      📹 Watch now

      📝 Resources from the International Civil Society Centre


      Session 5 – Building Effective Narratives to Counter Anti-Rights Groups and Foster Human Rights 

      📹 Watch now

      📝 Resources from ODI


      Session 6 – Can Citizen Data and Digital Approaches Foster Trust and Inclusion?

      📹 Watch now

      📝 Resources:

       

      Rachel Wilkinson

      Programme Manager – Futures and Innovation

      International Civil Society Centre

      Rachel leads the Futures and Innovation programme at the Centre. She is responsible for managing the portfolio of projects and events as well as leading and developing the Scanning the Horizon strategic peer learning platform. Rachel has more than 15 years of experience working in the third sector, on a national and international level, working for various ICSOs in international development and human rights in both London and Berlin.


      The Ambivalences of Power Shift 

      2nd October 2024 by Wolfgang Jamann

      Power shift, localisation, locally led, and globally connected are just a few terms that try to catch the characteristics of the debate around the future of civil society organisations, particularly international ones. Sometimes dubbed as the ‘industrial aid complex that needs to be overcome’, ICSOs are increasingly looking at a transfer of decision-making power to entities or partners in the Global South, while trying to determine their own future roles. A lot of transformation is already happening in the sector, and the discussions have moved from the ‘why’ to the ‘how’ and the ‘what does it take’. 

      Since 2018, the International Civil Society Centre (ICSC) accompanies power shift processes of ICSOs through so-called ‘governance labs’, where progress and challenges are addressed through mutual learning and exchange, and where best practices and failures are discussed alike. 

      Each lab has a particular focus. This year we met in Thiès, Dakar, hosted by the Senegalese NGO Tostan in their Training Centre, to concentrate on the interplay of power shift with the shrinking of operating space for civil society. The underlying question was, how far can power imbalances and the desire to shift power be instrumentalised by those who want to weaken civil society, particularly in authoritarian environments. And how do we stay true to our ambitions to localise social justice work but actively address its dangers? 

      A worldwide wave of nationalism is visible throughout the over 40 national elections happening in 2024. International solidarity is deprioritised in many rich societies, and liberal democracy and the role of organised civil society are actively undermined by anti-rights groups and oppressive regimes. International and local CSOs are under direct attack, the former being accused as ‘foreign agents’, the latter as Trojan horses promoting non-traditional values. In such times, the shift of decision-making powers comes with ambivalences, potentially feeding into nationalist, anti-liberal agendas. 

      This year’s Power Shift Lab was the second that was held in the Global South, after the 2023 Nairobi event. It was a welcome opportunity to enrich discussions in the sector from the perspective of local communities and partner organisations of ICSOs. Reflections around the impact of shrinking space were candid and open and showed the willingness to get it right rather than moving fast. While we are looking at a new sharing of responsibilities, we need to be clear about risk sharing, new types of accountabilities, and an increased sense of solidarity between different civil society actors vis-à-vis those who try to divide and undermine us.  

      Key Takeaways from the Power Shift Lab and What Leaders Are Saying:

      ICSC’s Power Shift Lab in Senegal helped us as leaders within the civil society community to reflect on the intersection of governance transformation and shrinking civic space, delving into how such transformations challenge yet drive change within a complex organisation and evolving sectorMaking space to reflect on our goals and hopes for long term power shifting allowed me to think about Plan’s role as a leader in supporting girls rights and girls in crisisHow might we consider more emphasis on governance actions that we can commit to today that can build momentum from within, ensure we approach a communitydriven approach to changes in our governance, look to external partners and peers for support, and, as always, ensure our governance centres the representation and needs of young people.  I also walked away with incredible learning from peer organisations – who had boldly embraced change in terms of operating models, global pay equity, decentralised headquarters, and pursuing outside culture checks – to help ensure accountability. Thank you for the space to think about ways to move forward, to do things differently, and to leave with even better relationships with fellow colleagues and champions. 

      Kathleen Sherwin, Chief Strategy & Engagement Officer (and External Representative)
      Plan International 

      My key insights from the Power Shift Lab were that considerable governance changes are happening across the sector, with many ICSOs not only acknowledging existing power imbalances within our organisations and with our partners and communities, but also the shared commitment to implementing and learning from new pathways to sharing agency and power, both internally and externally. While acknowledging the progress made so far, we must continue to explore new pathways towards more equitable partnerships, where local and national organisations take the lead wherever possible; meaningful involvement of diverse underserved and under-represented constituents in governance (children, people who are differently abled, youth, marginalised, etc.). We must also forward redressing institutional and financial hurdles (including donor policies and practices) by strengthening advocacy for systemic change across the humanitarian and development ecosystem. While we have focused largely on formal power in governance transformations, we hardly pay equal attention to informal sources of power and their implications for the power shift and the intersection of governance transformation and civic space. It is therefore important for us to take a critical look at our internal cultures and the external environment/cultures of the societies where we operate to determine how best to centre informal power and intentionally blend both formal and informal powers for fit-for-purpose governance frameworks and organisational strategy.  

      Mohammed-Anwar Sadat Adam, Programs and Policy Influencing Lead,
      Oxfam in Ghana 

      I had the privilege of attending the Power Shift Lab together with eighteen dynamic representatives of civil society organisations. I was puzzled by the topic and approached the lab with an open-mind and with curiosity, ready to listen, understand, and share. During these three days, led by Wolfgang and Myriam, we asked relevant questions about the future of the sector, and we managed, as a group, to picture different roles for the future of ICSOs. It was an insightful journey, enriched by the different backgrounds and levels of responsibility of the participants. In my opinion, the key word behind the power shift is changes. Changes with big C, as these would include multiple layers, some of those needing to happen at individual level, some others at organisational-governance level, and others again at systemic level. Exploring the power dynamics, understanding the trends of the sector – and of society as a whole – and the related obstacles, allowed me to better recognise my leverages for a change. It is a process, we need to play the long game, learning how to really put the communities we work with at the centre of our actions, learning how to remain relevant while the civic space is shrinking. 

      Francesco De Pasquale, Mali Country Director,
      Welthungerhilfe 

      Attending the ICSC Power Shift Lab was a very rewarding experience for me. It was my first time, and I found it incredibly insightful and enriching both personally and professionally. Reflecting on my own organisation’s journey and learning from others was a real eye-opener. The sessions, presentations, and discussions with a diverse group gave me solid insights into the concept of power shift and boosted my confidence to drive positive change in my organisation. One key takeaway for me is that every organisation’s path to power shift is unique, with its own milestones and success indicators. I highly recommend anyone in the development or humanitarian sector to join these labs and dive into the discussions on accelerating inclusive power shift. 

      Papa Diouf, Global Practice Area Lead for Health,
      VSO International 

      The diversity of people, organisations, and perspectives was again the key success factor for advancing our common ambition – to become more participatory, legitimate, and locally-led, while at the same time addressing practical and political obstacles in a collaborative way. This enables collective learning and sets a sign against isolationism.  

      Where do we go from here? The next step is to commit to action. Whether it’s rethinking governance models, addressing informal power structures, or actively advocating for systemic change within donor policies, ICSOs must push the envelope. As we look ahead to 2024 and beyond, let’s ensure that our efforts to shift power are not only transformative but also resilient in the face of external threats. 

      Wolfgang Jamann

      Executive Director

      International Civil Society Centre

      Dr. Wolfgang Jamann is Executive Director of the International Civil Society Centre. Until January 2018 he was Secretary General and CEO of CARE International (Geneva). Before that he led NGO Deutsche Welthungerhilfe and the Alliance 2015, a partnership of 7 European aid organisations. From 2004-2009 he was CEO & Board member of CARE Deutschland-Luxemburg and President of the CARE Foundation. Previously, he worked for World Vision International as a regional representative in East Africa (Kenya) & Head of Humanitarian Assistance at WV Germany. After his Ph.D. dissertation in 1990 he started his career in development work at the German Foundation for International Development, later for the UNDP in Zambia. As a researcher and academic, he has published books and articles on East & Southeast Asia contributing to international studies on complex humanitarian emergencies and conflict management.